Eastman Kodak Co. v. Atlanta Retail, Inc. (In Re Atlanta Retail, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the plaintiff did not have to raise objections to the bankruptcy plan’s confirmation because the objection would have only resulted in defeating the confirmation and not provided the relief the plaintiff sought under state law
• “Res judicata . . . [has] the purpose of both giving finality to parties who have already litigated a claim and promot- ing judicial economy; it bars claims that could have been litigated as well.”
• reciting \nucleus of operative fact\ standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).