Eastern Savings Bank, Fsb v. Papageorge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting RICO claim because \plaintiff has only alleged that the defendants engaged in acts designed to\ achieve a \single discrete goal\: \obtain[ing] control of the Property from the plaintiff at a low price\
• rejecting RICO claim because “plaintiff has only alleged that the defendants engaged in acts designed to” achieve a “single discrete goal”: “obtain[ing] control of the Property from the plaintiff at a low price”
• “Abusive or sham litigation does not constitute a predicate act.” (citing cases)
• “Abusive or sham litigation does not constitute a RICO predicate act.”
• “[Dismissal with prejudice is warranted here since there are no allegations in the plaintiffs fifty-eight page complaint, based on facts gathered over thirteen years of litigation, that could give rise to legal liability under any of the theories advanced by the plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).