· 3/15/2013
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Esteban.
Citations
- 129 Haw. 154
- 296 P.3d 1062
- 2013 WL 1091240
- 2013 Haw. LEXIS 97
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that TILA claim was barred by res judicata because it could have been brought as a counterclaim in earlier foreclosure proceeding
- stating that under Hawaii law, a judgment is final when the time to appeal the judgment has expired
- treating an appeal from the judgment confirming the foreclosure sale as a separate matter from the judgment of foreclosure
- treating an appeal from the judgment confirming the foreclosure sale as a separate matter from the judgment of foreclosure
- applying a de novo standard of review to the question of the applicability of the res judica-ta doctrine
- treating an appeal from the judgment confirming the foreclosure sale as a separate matter from the judgment of foreclosure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, Lee, Duffy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.