Skip to main content
· 3/15/2013

Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Esteban.

Citations

  • 129 Haw. 154
  • 296 P.3d 1062
  • 2013 WL 1091240
  • 2013 Haw. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that TILA claim was barred by res judicata because it could have been brought as a counterclaim in earlier foreclosure proceeding
  • stating that under Hawaii law, a judgment is final when the time to appeal the judgment has expired
  • treating an appeal from the judgment confirming the foreclosure sale as a separate matter from the judgment of foreclosure
  • treating an appeal from the judgment confirming the foreclosure sale as a separate matter from the judgment of foreclosure
  • applying a de novo standard of review to the question of the applicability of the res judica-ta doctrine
  • treating an appeal from the judgment confirming the foreclosure sale as a separate matter from the judgment of foreclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, Lee, Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.