· 6/23/1977
Eastern Marble Products Corp. v. Roman Marble, Inc.
Citations
- 364 N.E.2d 799
- 372 Mass. 835
- 204 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 229
- 1977 Mass. LEXIS 982
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that requiring employees to sign confidentiality agreements and separating manufacturing area from public view supported finding that possessor of trade secret adequately preserved the necessary secrecy of manufacturing process
- explaining that \basic principles of equity” and \an implied contract” forbid an employee from using or disclosing confidential information acquired during his employment
- although terms of confidentiality agreement may not technically have covered information, the agreement placed “employees on notice that secrets were involved”
- “What is a trade secret depends in each case ‘on the conduct of the parties and the nature of the information’ ”
- managerial employee may not solicit his employer’s customers while still working for his employer
- “It is settled by our cases that the duty of an employee not to disclose confidential information is grounded on basic principles of equity . . . and upon an implied contract, growing out of the nature of the employer-employee relation.” (internal citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Quirico, Braucher, Wilkins, Liacos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.