Easterling v. Weedman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony concerning the decedent’s statement that he did not want his son to be a beneficiary or payee of certain annuities was admissible because the statement was against the interest of his estate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).