Easter Lake Estates, Inc. v. Polk County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “takings” doctrine is premised on the notion that private property cannot be taken for public use without paying adequate compensation
• “[G]overnment action that substantially deprives a person of the use of property, in whole or in part, may be a compensable taking.”
• “[Government action that substantially deprives a person of the use of property, in whole or in part, may be a compensable taking.”
• rule 179(b) motion ineffective to challenge ruling on adjudication of law points
• “[G]overnment action that substantially deprives a person of the use of property, in whole or in part, may be a compensable taking.”
• “[A] person has no vested property right in a nuisance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).