D. Arizona· 12/2/1998
East v. Bullock's Inc.
Citations
- 34 F. Supp. 2d 1176
- 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 198
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20560
- 1998 WL 919692
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that there is no private right of action to enforce the FLSA's recordkeeping 14 requirements and collecting cases
- concluding that there is no private right of action to enforce the FLSA's recordkeeping 9 requirements and collecting cases
- finding that the FLSA’s recordkeeping requirements did not create a private right of action and denying summary judgment for plaintiff even when defendant admitted to violation
- finding that employer’s rounding policy complied with FLSA rounding regulation where the system did not credit all time worked but also credited time not actually worked
- rejecting the plaintiff's argument 18 that the district court could grant declaratory relief based on the employer's alleged violations 19 of the FLSA's record-keeping requirements and denying the plaintiff's motion for summary 20 judgment based on that alleged violation
- rejecting the plaintiff's argument 13 that the district court could grant declaratory relief based on the employer's alleged violations 14 of the FLSA's record-keeping requirements and denying the plaintiff's motion for summary 15 judgment based on that alleged violation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ezra
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Corbin v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse PartnershipNinth Circuit· 2016-05-02· cited 79×
- See's Candy Shops, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-10-29· cited 62×
- Alonzo v. Maximus, Inc.C.D. California· 2011-12-05· cited 36×
- Roberson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-04-23· cited 16×
- AHMC Healthcare, Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-06-25· cited 14×
- Floyd v. Excel Corp.C.D. Illinois· 1999-06-10· cited 3×
- AHMC Healthcare, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-06-25
- Levanoff v. DragasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-06-25
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.