Skip to main content
· 12/8/1972

East Oakland-Fruitvale Planning Council, a Nonprofit California Corporation v. Donald Rumsfeld, Director, Office of Economic Opportunity

Citations

  • 471 F.2d 524
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring the Office of Economic Opportunity to consider whether to override the state executive’s veto of a particular project’s funding, even though the ultimate OEO decision would be beyond review
  • statute conditioning action on agency finding that a plan is “fully consistent with the provisions and in furtherance of the purposes” of the law held to place judicially enforceable limit on agency discretion by restricting factors properly considered by agency
  • “If a statute or regulation establishes a TROUT UNLIMITED V. PIRZADEH 23 rule governing the conduct of the agency with respect to an aspect of the agency action, a court may determine whether the agency has complied with that rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamley, Browning, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.