East Coast Shows v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although HRS § 91-14 does not define a “person aggrieved,” such a person appears to be essentially synonymous with someone who has “suffered ‘injury in fact.’ ” (quoting Ariyoshi v. Haw. Pub. Emp’t Relations Bd., 5 Haw.App. 533, 540, 704 P.2d 917, 924 (1985))
• providing guidance to the Liquor Commission of the City & County of Honolulu on remand with regard to the proper interpretation of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 91-11, 281-59(a), and 91-13.5
• providing guidance to the Liquor Commission of the City & County of Honolulu on remand with regard to the proper interpretation of Hawai`i Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 91-11, 281-59(a), and 91-13.5
• “Legislative history may be used to confirm interpreta tion of a statute’s plain language.”
• \Legislative history may be used to confirm interpretation of a statute's plain language.\
• “[I]nasmueh as the parties did not raise these issues in their appeal to the ICA and Petitioner did not raise these issues in its Application, the issues are deemed waived and need not be considered .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).