East Cambridge Savings Bank v. Silveira (In Re Silveira)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If Congress intended for [the statute at issue] to be an ‘all-or-nothing’ matter, one might wonder why the provisions’ drafters chose to use the connective phrase ‘to the extent that,’ in lieu of the word ‘if,’ which obviously would have been a simpler construction.”
• “If Congress intended for [the statute at issue] to be an ‘all-or-nothing’ matter, one might wonder why the provisions’ drafters chose to use the connective phrase ‘to the extent that,’ in lieu of the word ‘if,’ which obviously would have been a simpler construction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).