Eason v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no manifest injustice so as to prevent the application of collateral estoppel if “the defendant’s total prison time would not be reduced if the illegal sentence was corrected” since the defendant was serving a legal concurrent sentence
• noting that the appellant, who completed youthful offender boot camp, argued in his rule 3.800(a) motion that the trial court erred in sentencing him following his violation of probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Martinez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-12· cited 8×
• Adderly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-25· cited 6×
• Qavontae MacHell Lang v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-04· cited 2×
• Steve Lamont Johnson v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-09-14
• TAVARIS DANIEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-03-23

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. McBride
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-05-15· cited 335×
• Cillo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-09· cited 11×
• Zolache v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-22· cited 9×
• Mims v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-19· cited 6×
• Mason v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-23· cited 6×
• Bautz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-31· cited 1×