Skip to main content
· 3/27/2003

Eason v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF BOULDER

Citations

  • 70 P.3d 600
  • 2003 Colo. App. LEXIS 408
  • 2003 WL 1562228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a county deprived a party of “a protected interest in property within the meaning of the Due Process Clause” where the county contradicted its prior express representation that a particular use of the property was permitted under the zoning ordinance
  • “In determining whether an agency has abused its discretion, the court may consider whether the agency misconstrued or misapplied the applicable law.” (citation omitted)
  • defining a procedural due process claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casebolt, Taubman, Nieto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.