Easley v. Little

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that attorneys have a general duty to regularly check court records and monitor the progress of pending cases
• stating that the CCS meets the general requirements for a valid memorial of the actions taken by a trial court
• explaining that “it is well settled that the trial court speaks through its CCS”
• party waived a challenge to the magistrate’s authority by failing to promptly bring the matter to the court’s attention
• “[I]t is well settled that the trial court speaks through its CCS or docket . . . .”
• “defects in the authority of a court officer, as opposed to jurisdiction of the trial court itself, to enter a final order will be waived if not raised through a timely objection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).