Earwood v. Reeves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Covington County, where receipt of the check for an allegedly insufficient amount occurred, would be a substantial component of the claim
• holding that Covington County, where receipt of the check for an allegedly insufficient amount occurred, would be a substantial component of the claim
• \Mechanisms exist whereby a trial court may hold that an untimely response does not constitute a deemed admission because the trial court has broad discretion in pretrial matters.\
• “[t]he permissive language of [Rule 36] respecting the trial court’s duties clearly provides that relief from the definite time periods is only available at the trial court’s discretion.”
• “[t]he permissive language of [Rule 36] respecting the trial court’s duties clearly provides that relief from the definite time periods is only available at the trial court’s discretion.”
• “Mechanisms exist whereby a trial court may hold that an untimely response does not constitute a deemed admission because the trial court has broad discretion in pretrial matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).