Earwood v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• crossing with multiple tracks and rail cars obstructing view does not present “an essentially local safety hazard”
• “The Court concludes that Plaintiff’s FELA claims are not precluded by F.R.S.A. The two statutes do not purport to cover the same areas. . . . There is clearly no ‘intolerable conflict’ between the two statutes.”
• rail cars obstructing view of intersection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).