Earth Movers of Fairbanks, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that provisions denying standing to appeal a land use determination were lawful under both AS 29.40.050 and .060 because prospective appellant was not a \person aggrieved\ under AS 29.40.060(a)
• analyzing former Fairbanks North Star Borough Ordinance (FNSBO) 18.54.070(A)(3) (1992) and AS 29.40.060(a)
• explaining the rationale for more restrictive standing requirements in zoning cases
• “[W]e thus adopt the majority rule and deny standing to a business competitor whose only alleged injury results from competition.”
• “[W]e thus adopt the majority rule and deny standing to a business competitor whose only alleged injury results from competition.”
• “In the area of land use law, the legislature has chosen to limit standing by statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).