Earnest Woods, II v. Tom Carey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• notice requirement set out 18 in Rand must be served concurrently with motion for summary judgment
• notice requirement set out 6 in Rand must be served concurrently with motion for summary judgment
• notice requirement set out in Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), must be 21 served concurrently with motion for summary judgment
• notice 12 requirement set out in Rand must be served concurrently with motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).