Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Earnest v. Virginia

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1324
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 307
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3492
  • 571 U.S. 1202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Newly discovered evidence must have been in existence at the time of the original judgment or pertain to facts in existence at the time of the judgment.”
  • “[O]nce a court finds a defendant liable for creating a risk of imminent and substantial danger, it will usually be the case that injunctive relief is warranted.”
  • “In a case of dueling experts, . . . it is left to the trier of fact . . . to decide how to weigh the competing expert testimony.”
  • plaintiff must demonstrate that “remedies available at law, such as monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for that injury” to obtain injunctive relief (quoting eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388, 391 (2006))
  • setting forth factors for considering whether to award injunctive relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.