Earnest v. Airport Motors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the anti-retaliation provision’s protections are incorporated by the federal-sector provision”
• noting that the “materially adverse” standard “separates minor harms from those that threaten to chill employees from opposing unlawful discrimination”
• noting that “the sort of workplace behaviors that Title VII serves to root out [are] repeated invectives of an overtly racial tenor”
• noting that “the sort of workplace behaviors that Title VII serves to root out [are] repeated invectives of an overtly racial tenor”
• noting that “the sort of workplace behaviors that Title VII serves to root out [are] repeated invectives of an overtly racial tenor”
• explaining that the Supreme Court widened the scope of conduct that can constitutes an adverse action by an employer from solely conduct that affects an employee’s “compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).