Early v. Early

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the fact that a former wife has become employed does not per se make a dissolution decree mandating maintenance to her unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Goff v. Goff
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1987-04-15· cited 72×
• Campbell v. Campbell
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1992-01-28· cited 22×
• Sprouse v. Sprouse
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-06-02· cited 19×
• Lemmon v. Lemmon
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-01-27· cited 11×
• Dow v. Dow
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-04-28· cited 10×
• Stanley v. Stanley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-06-12· cited 9×
• Habig v. Gohagan
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-01-10· cited 6×
• Sanders v. Sanders
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-10-24· cited 4×
• Baldridge v. Baldridge
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-04-24· cited 3×
• Grommet v. Grommet
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1985-08-06· cited 2×
• Marriage of Witwicky v. Witwicky
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-04-21· cited 1×
• Kathleen M. McLaughlin v. Kevin P. McLaughlin
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2021-12-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphy v. Carron
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1976-05-05· cited 7,357×
• Van Luvan v. Van Luvan
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1979-01-29· cited 12×
• Crews v. Crews
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-08-26· cited 7×
• Davis v. Davis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1981-04-28· cited 6×