Early & Daniel Co. v. Carr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing ADA reasonable accommodation claims as constituting a fundamental alteration of NYCHA’s Section 8 Program
• dismissing Title II claim “based on allegations that [a PHA] failed to assist [plaintiffs] in obtaining housing in a meaningful way and merely provided them with Section 8 vouchers”
• “[P]laintiffs cannot use their opposition to the motion to dismiss to raise new claims or arguments.”
• “[T]he benefits of the Section 8 program . . . do not include the provision of housing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).