Skip to main content
· 5/29/2003

Earles v. Perkins

Citations

  • 788 N.E.2d 1260
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 900
  • 2003 WL 21235360

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining false imprisonment under Indiana law and holding that “[a] defendant may be liable for false arrest when he or she arrests a plaintiff in the absence of probable cause”
  • defining false imprisonment under Indiana law and holding that “[a] defendant may be liable for false arrest when he or she arrests a plaintiff in the absence of probable cause”
  • “[B]oth Indiana and federal law require the court to determine if there was probable cause for arrest....”
  • all facts and reasonable inferences are construed in favor of the nonmoving party on review of summary judgment
  • all facts and reasonable inferences are construed in favor of the nonmoving party on review of summary judgment
  • “[B]oth Indiana and federal law require the court to determine if there was probable cause for arrest . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Kirsch, Mattingly-May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.