Earle v. Earle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that if a statement is not offered for the truth of the matter asserted, “[i]t may or may not be received,” depending on whether “it has any relevancy in the case; but if it is not received, this is in no way due to the hearsay rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Musser
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2013-07-12· cited 274×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-12-22· cited 106×
• Kingdon v. Sybrant
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1968-04-26· cited 22×
• Lorenz v. Lorenz
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1976-07-27· cited 7×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Herbeck v. Germain
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1906-05-24· cited 3×