EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY v. Tesmer Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirmation of fact “was clearly intended that [the buyer] should rely thereon and the [buyer] did rely thereon”
• affirmation of fact “was clearly intended that defendant should rely thereon and the defendant did rely thereon”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).