Earl v. Dunnington, III v. Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an agency’s continued investigation of an employee’s alleged criminal activity could “force a premature airing of the individual’s defense in a pending criminal case”
• finding the reasonable cause standard met when, in addition to four arrest warrants, the agency considered factual material culled from four criminal complaints and statements from complaining witnesses supporting the criminal complaints
• “[A]n indictment following an investigation and grand jury proceedings, would provide, absent special circumstances, more than enough evidence of possible misconduct to meet the threshold requirement of reasonable cause to suspend.”
• “[A]n indictment following an investiga- tion and grand jury proceedings[] would provide, absent special circumstances, more than enough evidence of pos- sible misconduct to meet the threshold requirement of rea- sonable cause to suspend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).