Skip to main content
· 7/1/1860

Earl v. Bull

Citations

  • 15 Cal. 421

Syllabus

<p>The doctrine of res judicata applies only to matters put in issue upon the record, and directly determined by the Court or jury. It is not sufficient that the point in dispute was raised by the pleadings in a former action; it must have been passed upon and determined, to make the judgment in such action a bar.</p> <p>In an action for the price of goods sold and delivered, there being a warranty as to the quality of the goods, the breach of the warranty may be relied on in defense, by way of recoupment, to mitigate the amount recovered; but it is not available as a complete defense to the action.</p> <p>In such an action, complaint contained two counts; one upon a special contract for the sale and delivery of the goods; the other upon a claim for goods sold and delivered. Answer denied the contract, and the other allegations of the complaint ; but set up a contract between the parties somewhat different, containing a guaranty as to quality, and alleging that the quality of the goods was not in accordance with the contract, and the breach was relied on as a complete defense. Evidence was introduced upon all the issues made by the pleadings. The Court instructed the jury that, “if the plaintiffs, on the day the contract matured, presented their account and offered to deliver the goods, they fulfilled the contract on their part; and if the defendants did not, within a reasonable time, and within the custom of the trade, make their objection to the article sold, and offer to rescind the contract, they are bound by it, and plaintiffs should recover.” Plaintiffs had verdict and judgment for the price. Held, that in a subsequent action by the defendants against plaintiffs, on the breach of the warranty, for the difference in value between the goods delivered and those contracted for, the former suit is no bar; that the matter in dispute, to wit, this breach of warranty, was not adjudged; that the instruction of the Court took that question from the jury, and directed th

Judges: Cope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.