Skip to main content
· 8/12/1994

Federal Case

Citations

  • 33 F.3d 217
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court had jurisdiction over appeal from Colorado River stay where all or essential part of plaintiffs case would proceed in state court
  • finding a stay final and appealable when the state decision would “constitute res judicata as to at least the two major issues” in the federal suit
  • finding a stay final and appealable when the state decision would “constitute res judicata as to at least the two major issues” in the federal suit
  • \Even dismissals without prejudice have been held to be final and appealable if they `end [ ] [the] suit so far as the District Court was concerned . . . .' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.