Earl J. Anderson v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]ecause the record conclusively shows that petitioner is not entitled 16 to habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, no evidentiary hearing was required.”
• once 22 dispositional review was granted, the claim was moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).