Skip to main content
· 11/14/1996

Earl Dugas, Jr. v. Trans Union Corporation

Citations

  • 99 F.3d 724
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29631
  • 1996 WL 628068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiff agreed “without objection” to settlement and stipulated judgment on the entire “action,” and did not distinguish or preserve class claims; under those circumstances, plaintiff needed an “express reservation of a right to appeal” class certification denial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Garza, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.