Skip to main content
· 12/16/1998

Ealoms v. State

Citations

  • 983 S.W.2d 853
  • 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 7718
  • 1998 WL 870836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Here, there is no question that the [Section 143.089(g)] file requested by Ealoms is privileged by statute. Thus, in determining Ealoms’ right to the privileged material, the court was obligated to conduct an in camera review 11 of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Cummings, Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.