· 12/16/1998
Ealoms v. State
Citations
- 983 S.W.2d 853
- 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 7718
- 1998 WL 870836
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Here, there is no question that the [Section 143.089(g)] file requested by Ealoms is privileged by statute. Thus, in determining Ealoms’ right to the privileged material, the court was obligated to conduct an in camera review 11 of the evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Cummings, Vance
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.