E.A.K.M. v. M.A.M.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 967
Syllabus
Final appealable order R.C. 2505.02 dismissal without prejudice divorce GAL fees newly filed action jurisdiction. Judgment is vacated. The domestic relations court's judgment in the newly filed, underlying action awarding the GAL fees incurred in the dismissed 2019 case is a final and appealable order because this order, if not immediately appealable, would not afford appropriate relief to the parties in the future. Furthermore, the domestic relations court was without jurisdiction to order the GAL fees in the underlying action because the 2019 case was dismissed without prejudice and is treated as though it never commenced.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 292×
- Bell v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court· 1993-08-11· cited 246×
- Denham v. City of New CarlisleOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-29· cited 209×
- Zimmie v. ZimmieOhio Supreme Court· 1984-06-13· cited 121×
- Denham v. New CarlisleOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-29· cited 71×
- State ex rel. Rice v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court· 1991-10-09· cited 64×
- Wilhelm-Kissinger v. KissingerOhio Supreme Court· 2011-05-19· cited 61×
- Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-06-27· cited 47×
- State ex rel. Hunt v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court· 1992-03-11· cited 35×
- Zhong v. LiangOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-16· cited 9×
- Taphorn v. Caudill-TaphornOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.