Eakins v. Sadler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even though the owners knew of some of plaintiff’s use of their road and made no objection, they were not charged with notice because no assertion of an adverse claim or of claim or right had been made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Green v. Lange
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-08-28· cited 12×
• Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Arch Associates
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1992-02-04· cited 7×
• Norman v. Allison
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-08-08· cited 3×
• Meek v. Ralston
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-03-26· cited 1×
• ROY A. HODGKINSON, ELISABETH HODGKINSON, ROBERT CAMPBELL, STEPHEN CAMPBELL and AMY CAMPBELL, and JUDY WOLF, Plaintiffs-Respondents and SHIRLEY DEINES v. STEVEN HATTEN
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2024-03-22

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphy v. Carron
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1976-05-05· cited 7,357×
• Teson v. Vasquez
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1977-12-27· cited 75×
• Roberts v. Quisenberry
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1951-07-09· cited 27×
• McDougall v. Castelli
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1973-11-06· cited 23×
• Miller v. Berry
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1954-08-07· cited 22×
• George v. Dickinson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1974-01-08· cited 19×
• Spooner v. Bates
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1977-04-09· cited 7×
• Chase v. Fania
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-06-26· cited 4×