Eagle Technology v. Expander Americas, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that emails containing an “electronic signature” are sufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds
• stating that “telephone calls, written communications, and even wire-transfers to and from a forum state do not create sufficient contacts to comport with due process such that a foreign corporation could reasonably anticipate being haled into court there.”
• noting “telephone calls, written communications, and even wire-transfers to and from a forum state do not create sufficient contacts to comport with due process”
• declining to consider on appeal arguments “materially different” from those presented to the district court, id. at 1139
• noting federal courts sitting in diversity must apply the choice-of-law rules of the forum state before reaching substantive questions of state contract law
• declining to consider an argument raised for the first time on appeal because the plaintiff had not raised the argument in response to the defendant's motion for summary judgment or in any post-trial motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).