Eagle Snacks, Inc. v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although plaintiff has expended considerable sums of money in marketing its product, the court finds that they have not met their burden of demonstrating that ‘Honey Roast’ is viewed by the public as designating the source of the product, ... .”
• drawing adverse inference from absence of a consumer survey

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).