Eagle Fire Co. v. Lewallen
Citations
- 56 Fla. 246
Syllabus
<p>I. A provision in a fire insurance policy that the policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed thereon shall be void if the insured shall procure other contracts of insurance on the same property, is inserted for the benefit of the insurer and may be waived by him.</p> <p>. 2. Forfeitures are not favored in the law, and notwithstanding the strong language used in an insurance policy in declaring the forfeiture, the policy is not void, but voidable, and the party who has the right to declare the forfeiture may thereafter treat the policy as valid and it will be so.</p> <p>3. Notice of additional insurance to a local fire insurance agent who has authority to represent the company in making contracts of insurance, to collect premiums, to countersign and deliver policies, to grant removal permits and to make endorsements therefor on the policy, to consent to additional insurance and to endorse the company’s consent thereto on the policy is notice to the'company.</p> <p>4. The acts of an agent performed within the scope of his real or apparent authority are binding upon his principal. The public have a right to rely upon an agent’s apparent authority and are not bound to enquire as to his special powers, unless the circumstances are such as to put them upon inquiry.</p> <p>S- The clause in the fire insurance policy placing a limitation upon the power of any officer, agent or other representative of the company in the waiver of any provision or condition in the policy does not supersede the law making the principal liable for the negligent, wrongful or fraudulent act of its agent, or the law of equitable estoppel, and this clause of limitation may itself be waived by the company through its agent acting within the apparent scope of his authority.</p> <p>6. In a case where, after the issuance of' the policy of fire insurance sued upon and before the loss, other insurance was taken out upon the same property, and the local agent of the company who issued the
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia· 1924-09-02· cited 54×
- English and American Ins. Co. v. Swain Groves, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-01-13· cited 46×
- Queen Insurance v. Patterson Drug Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1917-03-20· cited 37×
- Lopez v. AverySupreme Court of Florida· 1953-07-28· cited 35×
- Chambers v. NottebaumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1957-08-15· cited 23×
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-06-15· cited 23×
- Security Ins. Co. v. Commercial Credit Equip.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-19· cited 18×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri· 1955-02-14· cited 18×
- Dimick v. RayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-27· cited 17×
- Aetna Insurance v. HolmesSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 17×
- Beekman v. Sonntag Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1914-03-31· cited 15×
- Crim v. DrakeSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-11-14· cited 13×
- Southern States Fire Insurance v. VannSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-04-28· cited 11×
- Baker v. Union Assurance Society of London, Ltd.Montana Supreme Court· 1928-01-07· cited 10×
- Caledonia Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-05-13· cited 10×
- Murphy v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-08-13· cited 8×
- FID. & CAS. CO. OF NEW YORK v. BrittDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-01-20· cited 7×
- Cohen v. Home Insurance Co.Superior Court of Delaware· 1918-03-08· cited 7×
- Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co. v. Automobile Ins.S.D. Florida· 1922-08-30· cited 3×
- Ferguson v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-22· cited 2×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court· 1902-01-06· cited 321×
- Willcuts v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court· 1882-05-15· cited 65×
- Thompson v. Traders' InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri· 1902-05-21· cited 60×
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1897-06-23· cited 54×
- Pollock v. German Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court· 1901-07-10· cited 50×
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. ReddingSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 49×
- Sweetser v. Odd Fellows Mutual Aid Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court· 1889-01-24· cited 49×
- Lamberton v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1888-08-17· cited 48×
- Deitz v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1888-12-14· cited 42×
- Baker v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court· 1870-10-05· cited 40×
- Dwelling House Insurance v. DowdallIllinois Supreme Court· 1895-06-13· cited 40×
- People's Fire Insurance v. GoyneSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1906-06-11· cited 39×
- Kahn v. Traders InsuranceWyoming Supreme Court· 1893-12-01· cited 38×
- Home Insurance Co. of New York v. GibsonMississippi Supreme Court· 1894-10-15· cited 31×
- Aetna Life Insurance v. FallowTennessee Supreme Court· 1903-04-15· cited 30×
- Ætna Life Insurance v. NexsenIndiana Supreme Court· 1881-11-15· cited 28×
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. NorwoodEighth Circuit· 1895-06-17· cited 27×
- Insurance Co. of North America v. McDowell & BrownIllinois Supreme Court· 1869-01-15· cited 25×
- Orient Insurance v. McKnightIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-06-19· cited 22×
- German Ins. v. HeidukNebraska Supreme Court· 1890-09-17· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.