Skip to main content
· 3/17/1994

Eagle Eye Fishing Corporation v. United States Department of Commerce

Citations

  • 20 F.3d 503
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4688
  • 1994 WL 71453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming that pro se parties, like all parties and counsel, are required to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
  • stating that the right of self- representation is not a license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law
  • explaining that \the right of self-representation is not a license not to comply with relevant rules\ (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • noting that, by proceeding pro se, the [litigants] appeared “to have been penny wise and pound foolish”
  • finding waiver where party failed to assert argument before the ALJ notwithstanding fact that party raised the argument in NOAA discretionary review
  • finding waiver where party failed to assert argument before the ALJ notwithstanding fact that party raised the argument in NOAA discretionary review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Boudin, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.