EAGLE EYE DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. BRUCE ROEMMICH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that NYCHRL claims “must be analyzed under both the familiar 17 framework of McDonnell Douglas . . . and under the newer mixed motive framework” (cleaned 18 up)
• citing, inter alia, Forrest to establish that “the question is not whether the [employer’s] decision was correct or wise, but whether the reason for the decision was a pretext for discrimination”
• requiring causation between protected activity and employer’s action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).