Eagle Cove Camp & Conference C v. Town of Woodboro, Wisconsin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he fact that Eagle Cove has spent considerable time and money on various applications for rezoning does not constitute, prima facie, a substantial burden.”
• “Woodboro chose to be subordinate to Oneida’s zoning ordinance, and thereby relinquished its jurisdiction over land use regulations to the County.”
• RLUIPA not violated because plaintiff could locate Bible camp in other zoning districts within the municipality
• RLUIPA not violated because plaintiff could locate Bible camp in other zoning districts within the municipality
• “In determining whether a claim exists under the equal terms provision, we look to the zoning criteria rather than the purpose behind the land use regulation”
• substantial burden claim in New Berlin for “delay, uncertainty, and expense” was based on “indicia of bad faith by the City that led the Court to find-no compelling governmental interest that’ the City could put forth to justify its substantial burden on the Church”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).