Skip to main content
· 7/1/1859

Eagan v. Call

Citations

  • 34 Pa. 236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the denial of UC benefits where the claimant 5 traveled to Florida for vacation, and rejecting the claimant’s argument that his misunderstanding of eligibility rules excused his absence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.