· 7/1/1859
Eagan v. Call
Citations
- 34 Pa. 236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the denial of UC benefits where the claimant 5 traveled to Florida for vacation, and rejecting the claimant’s argument that his misunderstanding of eligibility rules excused his absence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Strong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.