Skip to main content
· 6/7/1999

Eagan v. Boyarsky

Citations

  • 731 A.2d 28
  • 158 N.J. 632
  • 1999 N.J. LEXIS 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that late notice did not cause “substantial prejudice” to defendants in medical malpractice suit because of the availability of medical records
  • concluding that plaintiff who only knew physician through HMO and was not aware that he was public employee demonstrated extraordinary circumstances
  • noting extraordinary circumstances exist where plaintiff had no reason to know defendant was public employee
  • noting interest in hearing public entity tort cases on merits when possible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garibaldi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.