Eady v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the “very broad interpretation to the words ‘arose out of and ‘to have been caused by found in the exclusion clauses of different policies”
• applying required “but for” analysis in examining “arising out of” language found in an exclusionary clause; ruling that coverage need not be provided because harm arose out of conduct that was within scope of exclusionary clause
• applying the “but for” analysis and denying coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).