Eads v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a “new set of circumstances,” including the grant of a new trial without Illinois parties who were previously involved in the case, warranted “renewed consideration of whether Illinois was” the most appropriate forum
• finding that a “new set of circumstances,” including the grant of a new trial without Illinois parties who were previously involved in the case, warranted “renewed consideration of whether Illinois was” the most appropriate forum
• “ ‘a compensated expert would be more inclined to testify wherever instructed’ ” (quoting Hulsey v. Scheidt, 258 Ill. App. 3d 567, 577 (1994))
• “ ‘a compensated expert would be more inclined to testify wherever instructed’ ” (quoting Hulsey v. Scheidt, 258 Ill. App. 3d 567, 577 (1994))
• “ordinarily, once a judge has made a discretionary ruling, the ruling will not be disturbed by a judge of coordinate jurisdiction unless there is a change of circumstances or additional facts that warrant such action”
• “ordinarily, once a judge has made a discretionary ruling, the ruling will not be disturbed by a judge of coordinate jurisdiction unless there is a change of circumstances or additional facts that warrant such action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).