Eades v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Mathis never addressed the ACCA’s different-occasions inquiry and, thus, did not abrogate our prior precedent on that issue
• “We recently held that the same Rehaif- based defect of which [the defendant] complains is non-jurisdic- tional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).