Skip to main content
· 11/26/1991

Eade v. United States

Citations

  • 792 F. Supp. 476
  • 69 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 446
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17885
  • 1991 WL 340299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • classifying defendants' statements on certain accounting decisions as opinions due to a lack of a verifiable \objective standard\
  • “[T]his case is not one in which the com plaint alleges that a company ‘engaged in improper accounting practices.’” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • S.D.N.Y. be tried separately, such as damages or some affirmative ce . Loa. 5 oe 2013
  • “Because the affirmative defense turns on an evaluation of reasonableness, whether the defense is available is generally a fact issue, rarely suitable for summary judgment, let alone a motion to dismiss.”
  • \Vague disclosures of general risks will not protect defendants from liability.\
  • “Vague disclosures of general risks will not protect defendants from liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kiser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.