Skip to main content
· 5/13/1964

Eaddy v. Jackson Beauty Supply Co.

Citations

  • 136 S.E.2d 297
  • 244 S.C. 256
  • 1964 S.C. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding where the request to charge was of a controlling principle of law and was timely made, the refusal of the charge was error requiring reversal and a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brailsford, Taylor, Moss, Lewis, Bussey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.