E. W. Bliss Company v. Struthers-Dunn, Inc., P. G. Bartlett, L. K. Clark, D. E. Henry and J. A. Dinges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that we will find an injunction order “excessively broad and consequently invalid [if] it goes far beyond restraining unlawful conduct on the part of the defendants”
• finding that a preliminary injunction stating that “[a]ll defendants separately and jointly are restrained from using or disclosing trade secrets and confidential tech- nical information of plaintiff to any person, firm or cor- poration” is impermissibly vague
• reversing, as too vague, an order enjoining defendants from \using or disclosing trade secrets and confidential technical information of plaintiff\
• defendant ordered not to deal with customers \for any other machines to which such control systems and/or components are applicable\
• where three former employees of plaintiff, all engineers, met while still employed by plaintiff to discuss the formation of a new enterprise, and left together
• defendant ordered not to deal with customers “for any other machines to which such control systems and/or components are applicable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).