E S Robbins Corp. v. Eastman Chemical Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that chemical supplier’s studies of how to prevent chemical spills during shipping and advice to carriers regarding safe handling of chemicals did not establish arranger liability
• finding the transportation and delivery of the chemical product did not constitute an abnormally dangerous activity
• manufacturer not liable for chemical spill because it “had no control over the off-loading of [its] product by its carriers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).