E. Ohman J:or Fonder Ab v. Nvidia Corporation

Oral argument

• Argued

  32 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding inadmissible the receipt of compensation benefits to prove party was a longshoreman and not a seaman
• suggesting a cautionary or limiting instruction may have cured the damage of admitting collateral source evidence
• reversible error to admit evidence of benefits paid under Longshoremen’s and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act in suit brought under Jones Act
• \We disagree with the suggestion ... that the prejudicial effect of the evidence of other compensation would be restricted to the issue of damages and would not affect the determination of lability.\
• \We disagree with the suggestion of the Court of Appeals that the prejudicial effect of the evidence of other compensation would be restricted to the issue of damages and would not affect the determination of liability.\
• evidence of collateral benefits is readily subject to misuse by a jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).