E. Nedene Wardle v. Northwest Investment Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Eighth Circuit appellate jurisdiction proper where claimant did not state cognizable claim and Little Tucker Act jurisdiction was thus not properly invoked
• Court of Appeals has jurisdiction over appeal where statute upon which plaintiff's claim was based is not a money-mandating statute for Tucker Act purposes
• failure to allege specific elements of Little Tucker Act claim \strongly suggests\ that no such claim was pled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).