Skip to main content
· 12/11/2001

E. Marvin Herr v. Pequea Township

Citations

  • 274 F.3d 109
  • 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20365
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that when petitioning, “a township and its supervisors represent their constituents and facilitate their participation in the government process,” and that a contrary rule would leave a townships’ citizens “without a voice in important matters”
  • rejecting plaintiff’s claim of sham litigation where opinions in underlying actions demonstrated that courts analyzed relevant issues “with care and some detail” and did not consider them “frivolous”
  • “The First Amendment right to petition extends to all departments of government . . . The protection it affords thus applies . . . to petitioning state agencies”
  • applications to county planning commission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.